Lawyer: Ohio Doctor’s Child Porn Counts Likely Dropped

Lawyer: Ohio Doctor’s Child Porn Counts Likely Dropped

NBC

A lawyer says child-pornography charges will likely be dropped against a pediatrician who faces trial next month on more than 40 sex and drug offenses.

» 2 Comments | Post a Comment

HAMILTON, Ohio—A lawyer says child pornography charges will likely be dropped against a southwest Ohio pediatrician who still faces trial next month on more than 40 sex and drug offenses.

Dr. Mark Blankenburg and his twin, R. Scott Blankenburg, also a pediatrician in the Hamilton area, face multiple charges alleging sexual abuse and bribery of patients

The 53-year-old Mark Blankenburg is scheduled for an Oct. 5 trial. Butler County Common Pleas Judge Keith Spaeth on Thursday separated the pornography charges from other counts.

Defense lawyer Mike Shanks says he believes the child pornography charges won’t make it to a trial. He says documentation shows that nine of 10 photographs are of men 18 or older.

Prosecutors have questioned whether the documentation is strong enough to stand up in court.

For additional information, stay with NBC 4 and refresh nbc4i.com—Where Accuracy Matters.
To submit a story idea or news tip, e-mail .
MORE: NBC 4 Local News | Local Crime News
NBC 4 SPORTS: Sports News, Video
NBC 4 POLITICS: Headlines, Interactives & Video

Advertisement

 
View More: twin brothers,sexual abuse,scott blankenburg,pediatricians,mark blankenburg,hamilton county,
Not what you're looking for? Try our quick search:
 

Advertisement

Reader Reactions

Flag Comment Posted by Buckimion on September 25, 2009 at 5:42 pm

The key point in there is DOCUMENTATION that 9 out of 10 are FOR A FACT of legal age. There may not be proof that the last one is or isn’t but given that the others are legal its unlikely the last one is different unless proven otherwise. And it also note that even the prosecutors have their doubts about proving the case.

Flag Comment Posted by buckgirl739 on September 25, 2009 at 3:03 pm

“He says documentation shows that nine of 10 photographs are of men 18 or older.“

My subtraction might be rusty, but I’m pretty sure that still means 1 of the pictures then is of an under-age male and therefore charges should not be dropped.

Post a Comment(Requires free registration)

The commenting period has ended or commenting has been deactivated for this article.

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Consumer Info & Money Saving Tips

Advertisement