Chillicothe Schools Consider No-Zero Grade Proposal
No-Zero Grades
The Chillicothe school board is considering a proposal to change the grading scale so that no student would receive a zero.
The Chillicothe school board is considering a proposal to change the grading scale so that no student would receive a zero. The lowest grade would be 50 percent.
CHILLICOTHE, Ohio —The Chillicothe school board is considering a proposal to change the grading scale so that no student would receive a zero. The lowest grade would be 50 percent.
Assistant Superintendent Jon Saxton proposed the idea of a no-zero policy to get students to do their school work.
Chillicothe Board of Education and administration say not all students are aiming high and they want to change that by removing what they consider a harmful practice.
“We look at the practice of giving students zeros for work that’s not completed and it’s punitive, as it, it’s like an F to the sixth degree, because the grade that’s given for a zero is six times greater than the work that’s poorly done,“ Saxton said.
Incoming freshman Emily Gray said she thinks the no-zero policy is a good idea because it will help students to pass their classes.
“It might be better for some of the kids because they, kids who get zeroes, it might bring their grades down lower and they might not be able to pass grades,“ Emily Gray said.
Gray’s father however, disagrees because he thinks students who don’t do their work shouldn’t receive the same grade as students who put forth more effort.
“But a zero is a zero and a 50 percent is a 50 percent and if you receive 50 percent for doing zero, I don’t think it’s a good way to teach a child,“ said Mark Gray.
Administrators said they’re trying to prevent zeroes from piling up.
“As a result of that, students get frustrated. They miss school. They create disciplinary problems,“ Saxton said.
“The whole policy is about encouraging them to do their homework. We want it done in a timely manner to teachers’ standards, but the bottom line is, we want them to do their work,“ said Randy Drewyor, Chillicothe Board of Education member.
Drewyor said the no-zero policy would be fair to all students, making an F just 10 points below a D.
He says it would provide equal intervals between each letter grade.
Supporters said they’re not holding anyone’s hand. They just don’t want students to give up once they get a zero.
The vote was tabled until July 22.
For additional information, stay with nbc4i.com and NBC 4 and refresh nbc4i.com—Where Accuracy Matters.
To submit a story idea or news tip, e-mail us at
.
NBC 4 POLITICS: Headlines, Interactives & Video
MORE: NBC 4 Local News | Local Crime News
NBC 4 SPORTS: Sports News, Video
Advertisement
Reader Reactions
I am not sure why this idea is being painted as a liberal vs. conservative issue. The question of grading has a scientific basis and the conversation should focus on this. The whole question is what does a grade mean when a parent receives it on a report card. If the student gets a “B” then the parent should be able with some precision to know the child knows 80% of the material. If, however, a grade is based on effort and participation, then it is possible for the child to get a “B” and know, say 50% of the material, but due to effort and participation the grade is raised. Now, that is grade inflation at its most egregious.
So, lets look at some of the other issues raised. In a previous post I was accused of not knowing how to average a grade. In fact, I do. Averages are useless indicators of nearly anything. Columbus has about the same average temperature as San Diego, but they certainly do not have similar climates. You would be foolish to move to Columbus thinking you would get San Diego’s climate. How about the baseball average mentioned? If I owned a baseball team, I don’t want a player with only a .300 batting average. I’d prefer a batter with a high on base percentage or slugging percentage—both better indicators of success.
For students, grade averages do not give us the critical informaiton we need to assess their knowledge. A better measure would a median average.
If we want to maintain the averaging system (it is easier and most folks can’t understand enough statisitcs to use the median as a grade), then we have to have a level playing field, or averaging will not work. When you have a system that averages “A” through “D” using a 10 point spread for each letter and a system that uses a 60 point spread for the “F” then you are statisiticlly skewing the results. The only remedy is to make sure that each grade category has the same amount of spread.
So, stop beating up kids with a twisted mathematical system. In 35 years of education experience in private, public and university teaching I have seldom seen grades motivate a poor student. Grades motivate only the best students. We need a system that truly assesses what a student knows and is able to do. We live in an information age and knowing how much a student knows is the only way to insure the student will be a contributing member of society.
To OmBass: I will knock the liberals because they are always the ones who come up with these hair-brained ideas. There is nothing wrong with the grading system. The problem lies with people who want something for nothing at someone else’s expense. You have to look no farther than Obama’s “spread the wealth” comment to Joe the plumber to see what is produced by this type of so-called education. Liberals are always trying to fix something that isn’t broken. They always want everyone to be on the same level which is impossible because you can’t raise everyone up to the highest level since not all have the highest abilities. Therefore you have to take everyone to the lowest common denominator. Liberals want to have guaranteed results. Opportunity is the only thing that can be assured. We all make choices in life and what we do with our opportunities is up to us, but the final results can never be guaranteed. I graduated from Westerville Public Schools in 1973 and I came out with an excellent education using a grading system that rewarded achievment based on performance. We didn’t get any pat on the back for doing nothing. You either produced or you didn’t. And when I didn’t produce, I got kick in the rear from my parents and was told to knock it off. I thank God for the tough teachers I had because they made me perform to the best of my ability and didn’t coddle me. It has paid off and I’m now going to be able to go into a semi-retirement at 54 because of many years of hard work. Let’s get back to the basics of teaching academics in our schools and quit the social engineering. Its pretty sad when these kids can tell you where to get the condoms and if those fail where to get the abortions, but they can’t point out a state or country on a map!
Half of something, for doing nothing? Where do I wait in line? Taxes, your taxes, pay for the liberal entitlement ideas. Is it 2012 yet?
Did anyone consider that this is a way to get inadequate teachers off the hook for not doing their jobs?
How can you track a teachers effectiveness if everyone always passes?
I can understand changing the system in such a way that prevents a child from suffering a whole grade year due to a bad start or troubled areas along the way. Progress is worth way more than individual test grades and project grades.
However, initiating a system that instills a sense of duty-free entitlement to a grade that gets them closer to passing is certainly a contradiction to the idea of ANY kind of grading system. We grade to keep track of the knowledge (or memorization) of the lessons taught. Demonstrating nothing does not equal demonstrating 50% of what has been taught. It just doesn’t. And the current system is not punitive… it’s as reward-based as it could be. You do the work, you get the reward. You skip the work, you skip the reward.
Certainly a 50% mark is not a passing score, and a failure margin as wide as the F category IS a huge margin, but it’s that way for a reason. It’s difficult to thrive in the world running on less than 50% of the knowledge a k-12 education can provide.
Sure, perhaps the scale by which we grade could use an adjustment, but if that’s the issue, go after the whole scale instead. The message sent by THIS change suggests that kids will be given grade welfare that allows them from the onset to slide on through by the skin of their teeth.
And to those who feel that teachers aren’t supposed to raise the kids, you’re absolutely right. Parents need to step up and do some parenting, no matter how tough. That said, teachers DO have a role in shaping. The attitudes and conduct of teachers is something that permanently etches the mind of a student. Can you remember your teachers and the way they acted? Especially the ones that sucked for whatever reason?
Oh, and please don’t knock “the liberals” for this… we’re not all equal, just like you conservatives.
My wife is a middle school teacher and they just started this lunacy in her district. No matter what the liberals say to justify it, at some point the little creampuffs have to come into the real world where employers don’t care one bit about your self esteem. They’re not going to accept incomplete work and you will be out of a job. This is what is referred to as the dumbing down of America. This is exactly the kind of mentality that produces the woman I saw on national tv during the ‘08 presidential campaign. She thought if she voted for our present “moron in chief” she wouldn’t have to worry about paying her mortgage or for gas anymore. Her exact words were, “if I take care of him, he’ll take care of me”. You don’t GIVE a kid self esteem. They earn it through achievement not touchy feel good lies! This is why we have people today who think everyone else who’s them “free” health coverage and their kid a “free” college education. Time to grow up America. Real life is not little league!
Dr. Dave,
I guess you do not understand how to calculate an average. By having the mimimum score of 50%, it will artifically inflate their grade if they do decide to actively participate in their education and do a little bit of work. Let them earn what they earn. And if it makes them feel bad about themselves, too bad. That’s what a failing grade that they earned is supposed to do. A little encouragement to better the next time.
Even looking at this from a mathematical stand point, if you turn in a blank sheet why give them a 50%, it would be a 0%. Although both is a failing grade why give the student a 50% when they didn’t even deserve that?
Ok, as a baseball coach I’m going to put this system to work for me. You strike out, that’s ok, your batting average is still .500! Everybody is happy, right? Teams will be afraid to play us with a team BA over .500, won’t they? Until we actually play a real game (real life) and get pounded. Hmm, our artificial stats did not help us when it came time to play for real. This is a joke. Hey, I just struk out, where’s my trophy?
Although I don’t understand why 50% should be the minimum, it is not the school’s responsibility to raise children and prepare them for the working world. That would be for the PARENTS! If you don’t want your child to fail, make them do homework. If they whine and complain- tough- make them do homework! You may say easier said than done when the kids get older. I have a sophmore in my house who would rather be with friends but I make her do her homework just like I make my 3rd grader. It isn’t a choice. I don’t run a democratic household or push parenting off to someone else. My husband and I make the rules and the kids follow them.
Post a Comment(Requires free registration)
- Please avoid offensive, vulgar, or hateful language.
- Respect others.
- Use the "Flag Comment" link when necessary.
- See the Terms and Conditions for details.



Advertisement