SWCS Students, Parents Adapting To Changes On 1st Day

SWCS Students, Parents Adapting To Changes On 1st Day

NBC 4

While the first day of school usually is met with excitement, students in the South-Western School district already are meeting challenges associated with cuts.

» 69 Comments | Post a Comment

CENTRAL OHIO—Wednesday marked the first day of school for thousands of Central Ohio students.

NBC 4 got answers as one local district headed back to class with quite a few changes.

While it’s a day usually met with excitement, students in the South-Western School district already are meeting challenges associated with cuts.

Wednesday morning marked the beginning of Clay Rife’s and Elizabeth Sliker’s sophomore year at Grove City High School. You could say they started the year off on the wrong foot—literally.

“I would ride the bus if the levy had passed,” Clay said.

District officials cut all high-school busing due to budget issues, and the two students said they have to hoof it nearly 2 miles each way.

“Oh boy, it’s going to be hard, and it’s going to be a long, long year,” Clay said.

“It’s not fun at all,” Elizabeth said.

Clay and Elizabeth weren’t alone, either.

Students weren’t the only ones who are upset about the changes.

Just ask the parents who have to drive their youngsters to school every day.

Alinda Streeter has to take time off work to drop off her daughter.

“At $8.50 an hour, I’m missing two hours of work, which is money out of my pocket, plus the gas in my tank to get her here,” Streeter said.

High-school busing was only one of several significant cuts made in the district. Walk zones for grades Kindergarten through eighth also were expanded.

The changes will be felt on Friday nights, too, when football stadiums remain dark and empty. Sports and all before- and after-school activities also were cut.

Clay and Elizabeth are being hit twice, in a way.

“We were really looking forward to having marching band, and we were really excited,” Elizabeth said. 

“I’d give up half my lunch to be in the choir,” Clay said.

“Kind of makes you think how the rest of the year’s going to be,” sophomore Trey Harshaw said. “A lot of people moved and stuff because of no sports, which means a lot of friends from last year won’t be here.”

As students adapt to a new school year with new challenges, uncertainty remains.

What is certain, though, is that a 7.4-mill levy vote is three months away.

For additional information, stay with NBC 4 and refresh nbc4i.com—Where Accuracy Matters.
To submit a story idea or news tip, e-mail .
MORE: NBC 4 Local News | Local Crime News
NBC 4 SPORTS: Sports News, Video
NBC 4 POLITICS: Headlines, Interactives & Video

Advertisement

 
View More: south-western city schools,levy,budget cuts,
Not what you're looking for? Try our quick search:
 

Advertisement

Reader Reactions

Flag Comment Posted by VoteYES4SWCS on September 02, 2009 at 2:12 pm

There are 6 Sexual Predators living within a 1 mile radius of my children’s school. My children will NOT walk to school until they are able to drive on their own. Also, with the cuts in SW Public library, by children will now be allowed to visit their school Library only once every two weeks. How does this help our children?

Flag Comment Posted by vernon6264 on August 31, 2009 at 8:24 pm

Think First,it’s ironic that you think the district is solely to blame for financial problems. You’re smoking weed or your name is…TERRY. In August alone, there were 18 school issues on the statewide ballot. In November, 2008, Maryville passed a levy after several attempts. In May 2009, Newark City Schools passed an operating levy after four tries. In November, Worthington will have a phased-in levy on the ballot. A state School Board Association official says nearly 62 percent of school levies have passed so far this year, showing education remains a priority for many voters.

Let me remind you that Ohio’s school funding system has been unconstitutional since March 24, 1997. The Ohio Supreme Court ruled that Ohio’s elementary and secondary schools are neither thorough or efficient, thus unconstitutional. The complete systematic overhaul, which has yet to occur, involves but is not limited to:
• a determination of a per-pupil base level that is predicated on the learning resources required and the outcomes expected of a constitutional thorough and efficient system of
public education
• fund an adequate education in every school district
• reduction in reliance on property tax
• elimination of forced borrowing to meet ordinary school district expenses
• provision for adequate funding for school facilities
• elimination of unfunded mandates
• elimination of phantom revenue
• provision for a statewide school facilities assessment
• provision for strict statewide academic standards including input and output standards

Obviously Taft didn’t fix the problem, and Strickland can’t get anything done. It’s more than obvious with the plethora of levies occuring in the state, and the fact that the STATE OF OHIO hasn’t done jack to fix the problem, SWCS is in the same boat as many, many other districts in this state.

Many districts that projected deficits will pass levies and/or reduce programs and personnel in
order to balance their respective budgets. (see www.ohiocoalition.org)The addition of local millage runs counter to the Ohio Supreme Court’s admonition to reduce reliance on property tax. Reductions in programs and personnel diminish educational opportunities for students. This diminishes the potential of accomplishing a thorough and efficient system of public common schools.

If all of you want to complain, get off of this Web site and get your email, pens, paper and feet working and push the state to fix this statewide problem. As taxpayers, no one wants more taxes, but as opposed to federal taxes being spent on bailing out Detroit and Wall Street, these dollars are going to fund something the entire community benefits from. The issue isn’t salaries - the are at parity with all of the districts mentioned in the post and more. BTW, the SWCS comparison group isn’t small districts like Grandview, it’s districts on similar size like Dayton and Toledo and larger ones in central Ohio.

So here’s where I agree with you…get busy and advocate for change. If you or I were doing something unconstitutional, we’d likely be arrested, wouldn’t we? Where’s the accountability from the STATE?

Flag Comment Posted by Think First on August 31, 2009 at 5:30 pm

HEY VERN… I mean vernon6264
What I find ironic is the fact that you seem to be saturated in the Kool-Aid. If you honestly believe that this Board, Administration and others… I wont go as far as to blame teachers.. but if you believe this group is doing a good job, you are simply blind or your name is BILL.. and maybe that is it. You my friend simply lack logic, this board and administrators have simply destroyed this community with regard to the schools. This Super has done NOTHING to bring people together. You are an example of that. You are the type of person who will praise a group of so called educators who have no compasion for the community as a whole and a group of administrators who are simply in it for the hard$$$. It has been stated over and over and proven by a VOTE that this community does not support MORE increases in salaries. ENOUGH SAID.. So that being said, the Board, Administrators and others are being defient demanding more money for their Salaries. And if you think taking away extras from the kids is an honorable way to get more salary, you need help. This Board, Administrators did this and more. They are responsible for this mess and NO ONE ELSE. So put your MONEY.. so to speak where your mouth is and work to hold them accountable. Stop being a whimp, if I came to your door and said.. hey either give me more money or I am going to take your car, you would call the police. So… get busy and do the same… it is time for change.

Flag Comment Posted by Laura on August 31, 2009 at 1:52 pm

Vernon:You know going to the board with ANY discussion of pay restructure is futile.They(SWCS) actually believes that they’ve made a concession(a temporary pay freeze),that as you full well know will be made up for in future contract agreements.
The only thing that can fix SWCS is pay cuts and restructuring of future agreements.Pay cuts are definately in order,because many of us taxpayers agree that they have not earned previous increases(proof is in SWCS ratings)and that they should receive NO INCREASES until their performance is brought up.10% cuts (and more from top paid administration employees)would more than balance the budget.
SWCS should do a poll of the community.If they would have asked people in the district if teachers,principals and administrators deserved raises and those raises would result in SWCS having to cut bussing and extra curriculars,what do you think residents would have chosen?
Vernon,do you remember when coaches were volunteers? Not paid?! EVERYONE’S in it for what they can get!

Flag Comment Posted by vernon6264 on August 31, 2009 at 12:46 pm

Have you been to a board meeting and suggested an incentive-based compensation system? Posting suggestions here won’t help nearly as much as going to the meetings and addressing the board/administrators because they’re the only ones who can change this system.

Flag Comment Posted by Laura on August 31, 2009 at 11:48 am

Just because you’ve been retained,doesn’t mean you perform up to par.This system fosters laziness.There is no reason to excell at your job when the do nothing next to you is going to receive the same pay increases and benefits as you.SWCS best teachers are the newer ones-not yet indoctrinated into the “pay for nothing(or showing up)club!
And you are right-there is a big difference from 20 years ago-MAINLY THE PAY and the struggling economy.What does it mean that homeowners cannot sustain the pay and increases that SWCSD employees recieive? Your pay has outgrown the communities ability to “sustain” its continued growth.It’s past the time to restructure the entire system!

Flag Comment Posted by Laura on August 31, 2009 at 11:28 am

Well,you can think that(that I wouldn’t be considered because of my attitude)if it makes you feel better,but my employer thinks the world of me and my performance! I’ve been “at it” for 15 years(same place)and am the only person that does my job there.So if I weren’t a top notch performer,I certainly wouldn’t last,because I do not have a contract that makes it impossible to get rid of me if I do not do my job!

Flag Comment Posted by vernon6264 on August 31, 2009 at 11:02 am

What’s ironic here is one, I am not a SWCS employee, and two, that you say the same thing in every post, just with different words, every time.

What’s pathetic here is that you seem to have no other purpose in life than to totally disregard the work others have done to improve this district despite overwhelming financial challenges.

What’s insane here is that you constantly discredit teachers and administrators who’ve helped the district achieve numerous schools of excellence. The vile attitude of people like yourself who constantly barrage them with personal attacks is sick and sad. You don’t make yourself look taller by making other people look smaller.

What’s appalling here is that you cannot prove better performance from years ago and compare it to now! Hello, it’s a different world than it was 20 years ago. It’s a different economy, a different state funding scenario and it’s a larger, more diverse district.

Why is it, Laura, that teachers and coaches that just left are already employed by other districts and are being interviewed in the paper which you seem to read all the time?

As an employer, I can tell you that your application/resume would not likely be placed at the bottom of a potential employer’s list - it wouldn’t even make it to the list - because you thrive on instigating negativity.

Flag Comment Posted by Laura on August 31, 2009 at 10:40 am

What is ironic here is that SWCS was a much better performing district when teacher,principal and administrator pay was the least.When the district decided it was being underpaid compared to other districts,it (SWCSD) set out to systematically pillage our school system for all they could get(district employees).You can see an almost direct correlation to the more they made ,the less effective they became as a district.
SWCS is a laughing stock.Not because of voters not passing the levy,but because they’ve been “busted” getting something for nothing with regards to their pathetic performance.Other districts’ employees wouldn’t say to your faces that you all “suck”,but behind closed doors they readily admit that SWCS employees are the worst.That’s why they aren’t leaving for other"better” paying districts-they’d be laughed right out of the interview.Their application/resume would be placed at the bottom of potential employers because that’s where it belongs-AT THE BOTTOM OF THE LIST-of potential applicants.

Flag Comment Posted by vernon6264 on August 31, 2009 at 6:19 am

I don’t understand. Every property owner will be equally affected by an increase in property taxes. And, yes voters will also be impacted by increased fees if they have students participating in extracurricular activities.

Post a Comment(Requires free registration)

  • Please avoid offensive, vulgar, or hateful language.
  • Respect others.
  • Use the "Flag Comment" link when necessary.
  • See the Terms and Conditions for details.
Click here to post a comment.

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Consumer Info & Money Saving Tips

Advertisement