Missing Toddler Drowns In Inflatable Pool
2-Year-Old Drowns
A toddler drowns in an inflatable pool in a family member?s back yard.
NBC 4
UPDATE: Family members find a 2-year-old girl facedown in an inflatable back yard pool 25 minutes after she goes missing.
COLUMBUS, Ohio—A toddler was found facedown in an inflatable swimming pool 25 minutes after family members said she went missing.
NBC 4 reported with the FAST FACTS.
Jaedyn Marshall, 2, drowned in a family member’s back yard swimming pool Sunday evening.
The grandfather was with her. He went inside to get the phone, and the children were playing on the swing. As he went inside, she went into the pool, said Detective Larry McDowell with the Franklin County sheriff’s office.
Family located the 2-year-old girl almost a half an hour after that.
Detectives said she climbed the steps and got into the inflatable pool.
Officials told NBC 4 she was fully clothed when found.
Rescuers began CPR immediately and transported her to Nationwide Children’s Hospital.
Jaedyn was pronounced dead at 6:07 p.m.
The drowning happened at a pool on the 2000 block of Sale Road on the city’s North Side.
Neighbors said the family had been good about keeping the ladder up and out of reach of small hands and inexperienced swimmers.
“My mother-in-law lives on the street. So I drive up it all the time, and you never see a ladder in the pool – never,” Marie Stober said.
Keep your pools secured, preferably with a fence around them. If you don’t have a fence around them or someone qualified to be around the children, take the ladders out of the pools, McDowell said.
The back yard pool is not fenced off and visible from the street.
For additional information, stay with NBC 4 and refresh nbc4i.com—Where Accuracy Matters.
To submit a story idea or news tip, e-mail
.
MORE: NBC 4 Local News | Local Crime News
NBC 4 SPORTS: Sports News, Video
NBC 4 POLITICS: Headlines, Interactives & Video
Advertisement
Reader Reactions
I’m going to post my opinion on here at the risk of being scrutinized but what the heck.
I honestly don’t think the grandfather should or will be charged. This was obviously an unfortunate accident. If a mother is not going to be charged for forgetting that her child is in the back seat of her car that she put there and is left in the hot car all day and dies then I don’t think this man will be charged either. Although they should be, a toddler realistically can not be watched every second. You turn your head for a second and they are gone or into something they are not supposed to be into. Again, this was obviously an accident and I’m sure the grandfather is heartbroken over this. Obviously he loved his grandchildren or otherwise he wouldn’t have been watching them in the first place.
Designer wrote: “People who are truly looking for an honest debate of opinions don’t resort to petty personal attacks. Most often a post like that means the person who posted it has lost the debate but can’t admit it, so she continues to fight because she has nothing better to say in defense of her position.“
Check my postings dear, I only responded to those who approached me. Also, what am I debating? I made my point: CPD will look to charge someone and if they do it will most likely be the grandfather.
So, can you tell me the psychological reasoning for why you and your crew are so into my posts and why you are making this about me and not the true reason for this forum: the news story?
My first post was as follows:
“So who is going to be charged: the parents of the child for not watching her (since she was “missing” before her death) or the owners of the pool for not having it fenced in?
This is a sad story.“
This was made before NBC updated the story with the fact the pool was owned by the grandfather. I later made a post stating that even though it may not be right, in the CPD eyes the grandfather would most likely be charged.
I am not sure why so many are crying about my posts. But thank you for all of the attention as it makes my day interesting and not so boring.
Amen sister girl! Well said.
Sunny, since you keep coming back to the “25 minutes” issue as the thing you have the most trouble with, try another perspective of the situation. When people drown, their bodies sink. This was a 4-foot-deep pool, so the child was most likely not visible until a purposeful visual inspection was made of the inside of the pool. In their panic upon discovering her missing, the family’s first instinct was probably that she had wandered off (as toddlers normally do), not that she had managed to climb the pool’s 4-rung ladder with her little 2-year-old legs. Time was of the essence and they probably initially tried to find her down the street, in the street, at a neighbor’s house, etc. That’s where they lost that time. You should allow for the panic of the situation to understand the 25 minutes.
Having never been in that type of situation myself, I don’t know exactly how I would react in the heat of panic, but it’s not illogical, nor is it in error, that my initial instinct would be to hunt for the toddler in surrounding areas and not that she had climbed into the pool. Especially if she couldn’t be seen at the bottom of the pool until walking up to the edge of it and actively looking for her inside. You’re making too many assumptions in thinking that the 25 minutes automatically reflects something bad.
Sunny, digressing into sarcastic personal attacks just because someone disagrees with you reflects your true maturity level. I suggest you go back and read your first posts. It seems you’ve forgotten the accusatory tone you used in them.
Freedom of speech is not a defense for rudeness such as your “full attack” post (or the sarcastic one you posted last week to my post); that freedom is a right. Every time you post a response like you just did, you abuse that right. You’re making it more and more obvious that it’s you who can’t handle someone disagreeing with you, and not, as you are trying to convince everyone, the other way around. Look up the word “hypocrit.“ It applies here.
People who are truly looking for an honest debate of opinions don’t resort to petty personal attacks. Most often a post like that means the person who posted it has lost the debate but can’t admit it, so she continues to fight because she has nothing better to say in defense of her position.
WARNING! Jenz is on FULL ATTACK!
Perhaps Jenz can post her email address on here so that we can all send her our comments, she can approve them and from there we can have our own comments posted (with Jenz’s approval first of course).
PRESS RELEASE: Jenz now runs the NBC41 forum…she is the forum police. If you violate her rules and say antying that he/she deems “mean” or “rude” or simply not to her liking, you will be attacked! (or she may just pray for you).
LOL!
I have not treated the family one way opr another - what are you talking about?
I am glad you continue post your comments on here…keep them coming, that is what makes this forum so great is when people like you and I can express our thoughts for others to see. But if the comments are making you so upset that you feel the need to pray for people, perhaps you should not conitnue reading the comments - just looking out for you there bud!
And as far as me being MEAN (lol…cute) I simply asked the question as to who will face charges - didn’t say it was right or that I wanted anyone to go to jail…sorry YOU got off topic.
I am glad you are paying such close attention to me and my posts…you are my first official fan.
And at the risk of exposing myself and omitting my anonymity - my first name is Sunny and my middle name is Love - sorry I can’t control the name my hippie mother chose for me…but I will work on expressing my wonderful charm you seem to be missing from my posts.
Have a wonderful and blessed day Jennifer. God loves you just like He loves me.
So them my comments and opinions aren’t included? You want me to get off and stay off because I disagree with you and post my opinions about your lack of a sunny and loving disposition as your name suggests? Gee, I don’t get my shot at free speech? That’s the whole thing about free speech, if you let one have it you have to let them all… Personally I think you are trying to convince yourself that you are loving and sunny. I think you should be more truthful with yourself and rename yourself “GloomyHater.“ I’ve read your posts on other stories and I haven’t seen one sunny or loving post. But that’s just MY OPINION! As a member of the Armed Forces I fully support free speech. It is my RIGHT to tell you that I think you are insensitive and just plain MEAN! Now, did I have to tell you that? No. Did you HAVE to treat this family this way? NO! Works both way gloomy one :)
Jennifer
PS I said another Hail Mary for you :)
Jennifer - thanks so much for your hail Marys…but really you can keep them for yourself!!
This is forum people, if you can’t handle the debates, comments, OPINIONS…then get off and stay off.
Free speech is a wonderful thing!
What should that lesson be hvacdawg? Don’t work and go on welfare so you can watch your own kid? Lose your father and your child in the same week? Accidents happen, terrible accidents. If for no other reason do you have any idea of what it would cost to incarcerate this gentleman? Still your question holds some validity, there must have been a reason why it took so long, are you the judge on if it was a good reason? Why do you have to know? Would it ease your mind if there was some sort of emergency? Would it ease your mind to know that the gentleman is getting forgetful? Again, I don’t know the answer to these questions, and I have evolved enough not to need to. Judge not people, especially when you don’t have all the facts, lest ye be judged.
Again to the family; I am deeply saddened by this story and hope that you can somehow overcome this. I’m praying for you.



Advertisement