Woman, 55, Admits To Having Sex With Boy

» 43 Comments | Post a Comment

DAYTON, Ohio—A 55-year-old woman has admitted to having sex with a 12-year-old boy.

Gloria Murphy pleaded guilty Friday to one count of gross sexual imposition of a person under the age of 13—a third-degree felony.

Police arrested Murphy after the boy told an adult that he and Murphy had sex on her birthday in January.

Police said Murphy did not force the boy to have sex, but since the boy is under 13, it’s considered rape.

Murphy was previously charged with rape of a child, but that charge was dropped under a plea agreement.

Murphy could be sentenced up to five years in prison.

She will return to court on Dec. 2 for sentencing.

For additional information, stay with nbc4i.com and NBC 4 and refresh nbc4i.com—Where Accuracy Matters.
To submit a story idea or news tip, e-mail us at .
NBC 4 POLITICS: Headlines, Interactives & Video
MORE: NBC 4 Local News | Local Crime News
NBC 4 SPORTS: Sports News, Video

Advertisement

 
View More: gloria murphy,dayton, ohio,
Not what you're looking for? Try our quick search:
 

Advertisement

Reader Reactions

Flag Comment Posted by The Roof on October 31, 2009 at 8:39 pm

I want to know what was wrong with the boy that he had sex with some old hag.

Flag Comment Posted by Tiberius on October 31, 2009 at 2:55 pm

This woman need to face the music, throw the book at her. However some of you are taking some things too far. Dont get me wrong we do need to protect the kids, but consider a few things, when i was a child my parents actually watched me, today most just open the door and let them run. I have a friend who has a daughter and said he doesn’t want a petifile living in the neighborhood, while i understand the sentiment this is the US if they have paid there time they deserve a chance to be productive members of society. dont get me wrong, hang repeat offenders. But, I have another friend, well someone i know, who has to file with the local police department everywhere he lives, he has had his dog killed mutilated and left on his doorstep, he has had some pretty nasty stuff painted on his houses and his life has been threatened many times, you know what he did to deserve this for the last 19 years? at 21 he had sex with his 17 year old girlfriend, a girl he had been seeing for three years, his birthday and hers were a week apart, her father never liked him and busted him as soon as he could. this mans life was destroyed over a weeks difference in birthdays. He wound up marrying that girl and having two beautiful children with her, children who keep getting questioned because of that.Are we going to castrate him? We have to start having the punishment fit the crime, I mean really, I’m sure a 15 or 16 year old fully understands what they are doing. I know I did at that age, and I’m sure all of you did too. Now I am not saying we shouldn’t go after the sickos that are going after any kids younger then that, so please dont think I am. But i do really believe a much clearer line must be drawn.

Flag Comment Posted by SteveT on October 31, 2009 at 1:58 pm

Heck no, she allready pleaded out in a previous case AND they gave her a plea deal here…wonder which judge she is related to?

Flag Comment Posted by SteveT on October 31, 2009 at 1:52 pm

Lets see what the outcome will be? Probably, probation. But, if it was a 55 yr. old male and a teenage girl: he would be tarred and feathered and life in prison. Lets see if JUSTICE is served here.

Flag Comment Posted by megalloyd on October 30, 2009 at 3:26 am

One Word

Ewwwwwwwwwww

Flag Comment Posted by really?? on October 29, 2009 at 1:40 pm

It occurs to me that I ought to back up and clarify something: Regarding the victims, I feel an incredible amount of sympathy towards them. To my knowledge I do not personally know any victims of these kinds of crimes, but I would be more than willing to offer any sort of comfort or help towards them they asked if they came to me for it. I feel for them and their families. I believe they have have done nothing to “deserve it” and hope that they are able to find a way to heal and to find emotional resolution over this. I think that the offenders should be financially responsible for every last bit of medical and theraputic care the victims acquire regarding the crime for as long as they live. That being said, I honestly believe that the victims are best vindicated when actual justice takes place.
The offenders who justify or simply refuse to admit to their crimes perhaps have no hope. Maybe there is no use in trying to reach them and they deserve to be locked away for a lifetime in order to protect others. But yet again Laura, I go back to the study that you brought up: Where medicinal castration was administered in a clinical trial. Now, as you pointed out, it was a choice participation trial. SO, at least some are willing to submit to proven reform over imprisonment. So what if the majority don’t? If any DO, then that’s a score for this idea of getting them back to being beneficial parts of society instead of gov’t funded shut-ins.
It is essential that we not bog ourselves down in theoretical treatment to the point that we forget to punish or we forget to mourn and assist the victims in any way possible. But, when things are clearly getting worse not better, it is time to reavaluate how we handle these offenders, and finding the most effective preventative measures we can is essential. And that’s why I am bent on playing devil’s advocate.

Flag Comment Posted by Laura on October 29, 2009 at 12:35 pm

They NEVER are sorry,only sorry they got caught.If they hadn’t been caught,they would still be sexually offending.
That is why my “theory” would prove something.Give them a choice of castration or life in prison(a life sentence is what was given their victims),I’bet the majority would choose to keep “their candy”.I heard a sexual obsessed with porn man say “he felt as if his wife was trying to take away his candy”.Over simplified? I don’t think so.
THEY DO NOT SEE ANYTHING WRONG WITH WHAT THEY DO,SO THEY ARE NOT SORRY.

Flag Comment Posted by Average Citizen on October 29, 2009 at 12:25 pm

PS:

really??

I understand the thought of not losing your hope and optimism.  I am only commenting on what I have seen and experienced professional AND personally.

Flag Comment Posted by Average Citizen on October 29, 2009 at 12:21 pm

really,

I was not suggesting we make laws on unverifiable numbers.  I am guessing you referring to the 1 out of 6 thing.  As you are doing in your posts, it is food for thought. 

Just to clarify, I was not trying to trying to be a jerk and throw your future kids in as a scare tactic. 

I understand that you are in a sense playing devil’s advocate (no sarcasm intended) and for discussion purposes I get it.

I am in a position where I have regular contact with the victims and the offenders.  Rarely does the offender acknowledged that they did anything wrong.  Even a drug dealer will come clean once they have pled guilty.  Not this group.  They will not acknowledge it even after they have pled guilty in open court.  There excuse is that they just wanted to get it over with.

I personally feel that there is too much concern for the offenders and too little concern for the victims.  Ok so the offender gets locked up for 5 years.  The emotional scars that they cause last a life time.  Where is the concern for the victim?  A lot of people tend to get stuck on talking about theories and what will work.  Yes I know the idea is to prevent future victimization, but I believe it tends to also distract people from the people who have suffered.

I was working in the criminal justice field already when I was working on my criminology degree at OSU.  I remember my Sociology 210 (I think) Deviant Behavior Class.  The TEACHING ASSISTANT, not a professor taught the class.  There were plenty of wonderful discussion about deviant behavior and theories about it, but she had NO real world experience.  I was fortunate to get the experience and the education at the same time.  What it also showed me, is that there is a tendency to over intellectualize these discussions and to twist and turn studies and numbers to point out and say what the surveyors/theorists want them to say.

Flag Comment Posted by really?? on October 29, 2009 at 12:04 pm

We have an astronomical rate of recidivism for these offenders and we write that off to “that’s just who (what)they are.“ Laura, you yourself pointed out that chemical castration proved affective. I also pointed to the study where 94% of the criminals in that particular program hadn’t regressed after ten years. There is hope for us to impliment these practices broad range and actually fix the problem and make them benefical members of our soceity as opposed to just locking them away on our tax dollar. And if we ask further questions, if we study this further there is a possibility we could find preventative measures that would allow us to combat these types of crimes prior to them being committed, which is hands down the best way to protect the innocent in our society.

Post a Comment(Requires free registration)

  • Please avoid offensive, vulgar, or hateful language.
  • Respect others.
  • Use the "Flag Comment" link when necessary.
  • See the Terms and Conditions for details.
Click here to post a comment.

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Consumer Info & Money Saving Tips

Advertisement